UMA

到底是 SEC 的文件更权威还是 Polymarket 更权威呢？Polymarket 的审核流程就是 discord 开展辩论，交给一个市值仅有 5500 万美金的加密货币项目 UMA 的大户进行投票 也就是说，Polymarket 的安全性和结果公正性，一个目前估值 120 亿的项目，承载了上亿交易量和对应结果的预测市场，结果的公正性仅由市值五千多万的项目的少数集中持有者来维护 目前，已经有多起 Polymarket 篡改事实，结果与客观事实不符的判定出现，而这起事件被广受关注、很显然 PM 官方不占理的原因在于 1. SEC 文件的客观性和事实权威性，远比其他能够主观理解的事件更高

Kalshi, Polymarket and the UMA whales will make for a great story one day.

polymarket will sign their grave if they allow the UMA cabal to vote NO on this unreal incompetence

Looks like @Polymarket is cooking in silence 👀🧐 a way better UMA resolver is coming and they are testing on testnet currently three things stood out 👇 1. one resolver handles everything, single outcome, multi-outcome, all natively. cleaner architecture, less surface area 2. createPublicUmaRe

据 Bloomberg 分析，在预测市场平台 Polymarket 的争议裁决机制中，仅 9 个 UMA（去中心化预言机协议）巨鲸钱包过去三年贡献了约一半投票权，并几乎始终站在最终胜出一方。报道称，随着地缘政治相关预测市场激增，2026 年已有数十亿美元交易量进入争议裁决流程，引发市场对 Polymarket…

Data: Multiple tokens have experienced a surge and then a pullback, with UMA dropping over 18% in 24 hours